End-of-service benefit is not years of service times final salary
The most common auditor finding is that the end-of-service obligation was computed arithmetically rather than actuarially. The difference is not cosmetic — it moves the number on your balance sheet.
- Published
- Approved by
- شريك المكتب — مراجعة تحريرية
- Official source
- IAS 19 Employee Benefits — IFRS Foundation
- Related service
- Actuarial Valuation
Every close season brings the same case: a company that computed its end-of-service obligation by multiplying years of service by final salary, and whose external auditor raised a finding on the treatment two weeks before the statements were due.
Why the arithmetic is not enough
The standard treats end-of-service benefits as a defined benefit — a future obligation that must be discounted to present value. That calls for three assumptions the arithmetic does not contain:
- A discount rate — the obligation is paid years from now, and its value today is lower than its nominal amount.
- Expected salary growth — the benefit is computed on salary at departure, not on today's salary.
- Turnover rates — not every employee will stay long enough to earn the full benefit.
The direct calculation ignores all three, producing a figure that can be materially higher or lower than the right one depending on your workforce profile.
Where the effect actually shows
In a company with recent joiners and high turnover, the actuarial obligation is usually lower than the arithmetic, because many will never reach full entitlement. In a company with a stable, long-serving team it is usually higher, because expected salary growth outweighs discounting. The direction cannot be guessed from company size; it has to be measured.
If your auditor raised this last year and it was closed with a promise to address it, it will come back this year — usually in stronger terms.
What saves you time
Prepare the employee census early: joining date, basic salary, date of birth, contract type. The quality of the valuation follows the quality of that census, and what delays actuarial work is rarely the calculation — it is waiting on incomplete data. Better still, schedule the valuation ahead of close season rather than inside it, when everyone is under the same time pressure.
The information published here is general and is not professional advice on a specific case. Contact us for an opinion on your own entity.
If this applies to your business, request a quote for Actuarial Valuation.
Request a quote for this service